Fast on a phone, first time
Pages are small and arrive ready to read. There is no template bloat and no queue of third-party scripts before the content appears.
Case study
A Wimbledon firm of party wall specialists advising building and adjoining owners across Greater London since 2008. The site was rebuilt from Squarespace — same content, none of the platform's cost or constraints, and a faster, more private experience for the people who use it.
The brief
Party wall work sits between homeowners, architects and developers. The site has to explain a statutory process, set out fixed-fee services, cover service areas and carry client reviews — without making a nervous homeowner read legislation to find out what happens next.
The existing site did that on Squarespace. The problem was ownership: a page builder on a monthly plan, a template's opinions about layout, and content that could not be moved without rebuilding it somewhere else. The decision was to take the whole thing in-house rather than keep renting the foundation.
Decisions
Pages are small and arrive ready to read. There is no template bloat and no queue of third-party scripts before the content appears.
The site sets no advertising or tracking cookies, so there is no banner interrupting the first visit and nothing for a visitor to consent to.
Traffic is measured by analytics we run ourselves, not a third-party tag. There is no advertising pixel, no visitor profile sold on, and no Google Analytics.
Service pages, service areas and plain-language answers are structured so search engines and assistants can understand what the firm does and where it works.
The move
A practice that has been online since 2008 has accumulated links, rankings and pages that customers still arrive on. The rebuild kept those pages and the content that earned them, so visibility built up over years was not thrown away for a new look.
New guidance pages can be added as the firm's advice grows, without a redesign or a subscription to a third-party editor. The site stays a marketing asset the firm controls rather than a platform it rents.
The benefit
Standards
The site is live, maintained by us, and still growing as the firm's guidance does.
Questions
Ownership and cost. A page builder charges rent for the foundation and constrains the layout. The rebuilt site belongs to the firm and is shaped around the content rather than a template.
The rebuild kept the pages and content that carried search value, so visibility built up since 2008 was protected rather than reset. We would not claim a ranking outcome we cannot measure, but the move was planned around not breaking what already worked.
There is no admin account to maintain or lose. Updates are made as part of the site's care, which suits a firm that publishes in bursts rather than daily.
Tell us what is slow, expensive or error-prone. We will tell you honestly whether we can help, what it would take, and roughly what it would cost — before anyone signs anything.