Guide

Answer engine optimisation, without the snake oil

AI answers are influenced by the same things that make a business legible to any search engine: consistent facts, a real entity, structured data and content that answers the question. Most of the “AEO” tactics sold today are either unproven or actively misleading.

Answer engine optimisation, generative engine optimisation and AI search optimisation are three names for one question: how does a business get cited by an assistant? The honest answer is that the mechanisms are still developing, the measurement is poor, and the fundamentals are unglamorous.

An assistant needs to identify an entity, verify a fact and find a source. That means consistent naming, a real address and phone, a complete Google profile, a crawlable site with clear pages, and content that states the answer plainly. No amount of “llms.txt” fixes a business that cannot be identified.

What works

The fundamentals, in order

Consistent entity

The same business name, description, address or service area, phone and URL across the site, the profile, Companies House and your social profiles. Organization schema with sameAs links where they are real.

Answer-first pages

The direct answer in the first 60 words, then the detail. This is good writing for people and the only format an extractor can reliably quote.

Structured facts

Service, areaServed, FAQPage and BreadcrumbList schema. Tables for prices and comparisons. Dates on guides. Facts in a form a machine can parse.

A real Google profile

Local AI answers lean heavily on the profile, reviews, proximity and categories. There is no shortcut around it.

Citations and mentions

Local press, chambers, directories, client sites and industry bodies. The same links that help conventional search help an assistant decide you are real.

Measurement

Track AI referrals as their own channel in analytics. Expect them to be small and noisy. Do not replace call tracking with an assumption.

What does not

Tactics that do not deserve your money

  • llms.txt as a ranking leverIt is a convenience file. Google has said it does not use it, and no major assistant has confirmed it as a ranking signal. Publish it if you like; do not pay for it.
  • AI-generated content at volumeAssistants cite sources they can trust. A thousand generic pages with no experience behind them are not a trust signal.
  • Keyword-stuffed FAQsA FAQ that repeats the same phrase in twelve ways is not more likely to be quoted. It is less likely to be read.
  • “Guaranteed AI visibility”Nobody can guarantee what a model will say next week. Anyone selling certainty is selling a screenshot.
  • Schema for reviews you collectSelf-serving review schema does not produce rich results and can create a manual-action risk. Show testimonials visibly instead.

Reality

What to expect, by channel

ChannelTypical roleWhat to measure
Google organicThe main source of commercial enquiriesImpressions, clicks, enquiries by page
Local packCalls and direction requestsProfile calls, directions, website clicks
AI OverviewsInformational queries, some commercial researchReferrals where identifiable; brand search lift
AI assistantsResearch and recommendationReferral traffic tagged by source; direct brand queries
Direct and referralThe compounding effect of being knownBrand search volume, direct sessions, repeat enquiries

Practical

What we would do for a Dorset business

Fix the entity first: profile, NAP, schema, consistent description. Then make every important page answer its question in the first paragraph and carry a date. Add a visible FAQ with real questions. Publish one genuinely useful piece of local data or a guide, and earn a handful of local mentions. Measure referrals separately and do not panic when they are small.

That is not a new discipline. It is the same work as good local SEO, with a different extraction layer on top. The businesses that benefit will be the ones that were already legible.

Related

Related

Questions

The things people ask first

Is AEO different from SEO?

It is a layer on top. The entity, the crawlable site, the structured facts and the citations all come from SEO. The difference is formatting for extraction: answer-first, dated, specific.

Should we publish an llms.txt?

It is harmless and cheap. It is not a ranking tactic, and we would not charge for it as one.

How do we measure AI traffic?

Tag referrals by source in analytics, watch brand search volume, and ask new enquirers how they found you. The data is imperfect; the conversation is not.

Will AI answers replace our website?

For simple factual questions, sometimes. For a considered purchase — a builder, a solicitor, a hotel — people still check the site before they call. The site's job is to be the source that survives the check.

Let’s find out whether technology is the answer

Tell us what you are trying to achieve. We will tell you honestly whether we can help, what it would take, and roughly what it would cost — before anyone signs anything.